Thursday, June 17, 2010
Assignment 1 - Service Learning Experience/Observation
Service Learning Experience/observation assignment
Does the teacher do the following:
• Treat all students equitably? Most of the time.
• Recognize diversity with respect? Most times
• Recognize different learning styles? Yes
• Instruct all students? Yes
• Provide an open climate? Most times
• Use alternate and diverse materials? Yes
• Accommodate or make provisions for needs of students? Yes
• Model learning to encourage diverse students? Yes
Reflection on service learning experience/observation:
My servicing learning experience proofed to be beneficial in working in the Access Department of Miami Dade College. The Access Department provides assistance and services for students with various types of disabilities. Although I am a student of the access department, I gained further understanding and appreciation of interaction between the students and the staff that have different disabilities that are different from my own. In my observations, most of the staff worked their very best in assisting the students with their individual learning needs and restrictions. I found each staff member to be patient, respectful, knowledgeable, skillful, kind and caring. Whether the student was deaf, blind, wheelchair bound, speech impediment or any other type of disability, all were equitably taken care of professionally and with a sense of sensitivity to their personal situation.
Only in a few instances did I observe interaction between a student and staff as not being equitable. A decorum of patience and sensitivity is required when working with the culture of disabled persons. When they are trying to articulate their thoughts or trying to comprehend and process what is being instructed or explained, one must be patient and use listening skills. Impatience and rushing the person to finish is not an acceptable learning environment. I also encountered the experience of observing a superior attitude in dealing with students. A learning professional should never make a student feel uncomfortable to the point of being inferior simply because they do not comprehend what is being instructed. Perhaps the learning professional should have taken another route in explaining and not talk down to the student. In my opinion, this eliminates an open climate in the classroom. The student now feels inferior and is afraid to voice opinions and concerns because of fear of being ridiculed. An Intercultural atmosphere should be the goal of every learning professional and while most in my service learning experience exhibited equitable behavior toward the students a small few are in need of further specialized training.
Does the teacher do the following:
• Treat all students equitably? Most of the time.
• Recognize diversity with respect? Most times
• Recognize different learning styles? Yes
• Instruct all students? Yes
• Provide an open climate? Most times
• Use alternate and diverse materials? Yes
• Accommodate or make provisions for needs of students? Yes
• Model learning to encourage diverse students? Yes
Reflection on service learning experience/observation:
My servicing learning experience proofed to be beneficial in working in the Access Department of Miami Dade College. The Access Department provides assistance and services for students with various types of disabilities. Although I am a student of the access department, I gained further understanding and appreciation of interaction between the students and the staff that have different disabilities that are different from my own. In my observations, most of the staff worked their very best in assisting the students with their individual learning needs and restrictions. I found each staff member to be patient, respectful, knowledgeable, skillful, kind and caring. Whether the student was deaf, blind, wheelchair bound, speech impediment or any other type of disability, all were equitably taken care of professionally and with a sense of sensitivity to their personal situation.
Only in a few instances did I observe interaction between a student and staff as not being equitable. A decorum of patience and sensitivity is required when working with the culture of disabled persons. When they are trying to articulate their thoughts or trying to comprehend and process what is being instructed or explained, one must be patient and use listening skills. Impatience and rushing the person to finish is not an acceptable learning environment. I also encountered the experience of observing a superior attitude in dealing with students. A learning professional should never make a student feel uncomfortable to the point of being inferior simply because they do not comprehend what is being instructed. Perhaps the learning professional should have taken another route in explaining and not talk down to the student. In my opinion, this eliminates an open climate in the classroom. The student now feels inferior and is afraid to voice opinions and concerns because of fear of being ridiculed. An Intercultural atmosphere should be the goal of every learning professional and while most in my service learning experience exhibited equitable behavior toward the students a small few are in need of further specialized training.
Reflection 13
Reflection #13: Reflect on what you’ve learned about race and racism.
The only purpose of racism is to dehumanize and oppress other groups and cultures whose only hope is to be good citizens, serve their community or country and provide for their families. I am amazed at the fact that everyone came to this country- the new world - on the premise of religion and other unalienable rights they were being denied and now other cultures are coming for the same reasons and are being discriminated against. I suppose somewhere along the line, the temptation of being on top so to speak took over. Racism is under the broad umbrella of chauvinism and oppression as I view these terminologies to mean the same. Chauvinism as it pertains to racism has several characteristics. One is the superiority factor – the belief that their race is better or above all others. This was clearly identified with Hitler and Nazi Germany which led to the Holocaust. Many of the countries that practice Genocide are guilty of this as well. Another characteristic is the belief that other ethnic groups are strange. They think that they should be feared and avoided. In other words, they should not interact with them and they have no business occupying their land. These groups that deem themselves to be superior feel that they should be entitled to special privileges just because of who they are. They fuel their cause on the premise that foreign groups will try to take control and siege their power. Racist people also believe that if they do gain power it will be misused I find this statement to be very ironic as they fail to see that this is exactly what they are doing. Racism denies power and it also handicaps the receiving of resources. This happens in employment practices, banking/mortgage industry, healthcare, childcare, education and assisted services. Finally racism denies position in society for a member or the entire ethnic group on a whole. Many times people or groups of people that feel they are superior will turn to violent behavior. Some are very blatant and is called overt individual racial violence. These people that carry out such acts believe that the law is on their side and they do not have to deny or hide the crime. There were many of these instances in the south during the civil rights movement. I believe the main driving forces of racism are fear and ignorance. Our nation has taken measures to rectify racism and hold those accountable to the full extent of the law. Unfortunately, much work still needs to be done to cleanse our world from racism. One can only hope that with the evolution of man and paradigm shifts that racism will absolve itself.
The only purpose of racism is to dehumanize and oppress other groups and cultures whose only hope is to be good citizens, serve their community or country and provide for their families. I am amazed at the fact that everyone came to this country- the new world - on the premise of religion and other unalienable rights they were being denied and now other cultures are coming for the same reasons and are being discriminated against. I suppose somewhere along the line, the temptation of being on top so to speak took over. Racism is under the broad umbrella of chauvinism and oppression as I view these terminologies to mean the same. Chauvinism as it pertains to racism has several characteristics. One is the superiority factor – the belief that their race is better or above all others. This was clearly identified with Hitler and Nazi Germany which led to the Holocaust. Many of the countries that practice Genocide are guilty of this as well. Another characteristic is the belief that other ethnic groups are strange. They think that they should be feared and avoided. In other words, they should not interact with them and they have no business occupying their land. These groups that deem themselves to be superior feel that they should be entitled to special privileges just because of who they are. They fuel their cause on the premise that foreign groups will try to take control and siege their power. Racist people also believe that if they do gain power it will be misused I find this statement to be very ironic as they fail to see that this is exactly what they are doing. Racism denies power and it also handicaps the receiving of resources. This happens in employment practices, banking/mortgage industry, healthcare, childcare, education and assisted services. Finally racism denies position in society for a member or the entire ethnic group on a whole. Many times people or groups of people that feel they are superior will turn to violent behavior. Some are very blatant and is called overt individual racial violence. These people that carry out such acts believe that the law is on their side and they do not have to deny or hide the crime. There were many of these instances in the south during the civil rights movement. I believe the main driving forces of racism are fear and ignorance. Our nation has taken measures to rectify racism and hold those accountable to the full extent of the law. Unfortunately, much work still needs to be done to cleanse our world from racism. One can only hope that with the evolution of man and paradigm shifts that racism will absolve itself.
Reflection 12
Reflection Paper #12: Compare the patterns of Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing in Rwanda, Bosnia and Dafur. What insights have you gained from reading about these atrocities?
Ethnic cleansing is the removal of an unwanted ethnic group either by a mass exodus to another region or country or by genocide. Genocide is a deliberate and organized plan put in place by the ruling government to extinguish another ethnic group or culture. Although genocide is considered to be a very serious crime against humanity by the United Nation and the world in general, it still seems to occur. I find it perplexing that ethnic cleansing is not considered a crime when acts of genocide are under its umbrella. I suppose that if they were to consider ethnic cleansing a crime, a lot more countries, including the United States would find themselves guilty. Most people are familiar with the Holocaust which was a classic case of ethnic cleansing; however, this practice has and is taking place in other countries such as Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Dafur. The governments of these countries decide for whatever hateful reason they can come up with to exile or annihilate a group of people and occupy their land. This makes me think of the Native American Indians in a sense. I can truthfully say I have never seen one although I know they are still around – not even in the casinos – but I digress.
The patterns and or tactics used to disemble the unwanted ethnic groups are pretty much the same. The efforts by the government are very organized and calculating in there make up. In order to gain control of that region, the government will surround them and most times will give them the option to leave voluntarily. Then, to gain further control, they will kill all political and public figureheads of that group. As in the case of Yugoslavia, the men, women and children were all separated. Then the women, children and old men were driven to neighboring countries while the young and strong men from the age of sixteen were murdered and quickly buried in an effort to revert attention. The tactics used for intimidation and control are murder, rape, torture, destruction of public, personal or cultural property and artifacts, theft/robbery, elimination of food source or supply and displacement by force. Certain human rights watch groups, and the United Nation are keeping a close watch on these atrocities but I feel more action is required. I believe that the humanitarian international laws must swiftly be exacted on these ruthless governments.
Ethnic cleansing is the removal of an unwanted ethnic group either by a mass exodus to another region or country or by genocide. Genocide is a deliberate and organized plan put in place by the ruling government to extinguish another ethnic group or culture. Although genocide is considered to be a very serious crime against humanity by the United Nation and the world in general, it still seems to occur. I find it perplexing that ethnic cleansing is not considered a crime when acts of genocide are under its umbrella. I suppose that if they were to consider ethnic cleansing a crime, a lot more countries, including the United States would find themselves guilty. Most people are familiar with the Holocaust which was a classic case of ethnic cleansing; however, this practice has and is taking place in other countries such as Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Dafur. The governments of these countries decide for whatever hateful reason they can come up with to exile or annihilate a group of people and occupy their land. This makes me think of the Native American Indians in a sense. I can truthfully say I have never seen one although I know they are still around – not even in the casinos – but I digress.
The patterns and or tactics used to disemble the unwanted ethnic groups are pretty much the same. The efforts by the government are very organized and calculating in there make up. In order to gain control of that region, the government will surround them and most times will give them the option to leave voluntarily. Then, to gain further control, they will kill all political and public figureheads of that group. As in the case of Yugoslavia, the men, women and children were all separated. Then the women, children and old men were driven to neighboring countries while the young and strong men from the age of sixteen were murdered and quickly buried in an effort to revert attention. The tactics used for intimidation and control are murder, rape, torture, destruction of public, personal or cultural property and artifacts, theft/robbery, elimination of food source or supply and displacement by force. Certain human rights watch groups, and the United Nation are keeping a close watch on these atrocities but I feel more action is required. I believe that the humanitarian international laws must swiftly be exacted on these ruthless governments.
Reflection 11
Reflection Paper #11: Reflect on the Holocaust. What do you think about people who say it didn’t happen?
The Holocaust was an atrocity of ginormous proportions that should not have ever taken place. The attempted genocide or extinction of approximately six million European Jews is documented as one of the worst dehumanizing experience of a people. This was also one of the worst acts against another culture. The reason for this was a pseudo belief of ethnic superiority by Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany during World War II. They were under the belief that they were of Aryan- blond hair, blue eyed and tall - descent and was indeed superior. The proper context of the term Aryan was used to describe different European languages but the Nazis distorted it to solidify their racial perversion. Even though the Jews are most widely acknowledged in the Holocaust, others were subjected to the wrath and hatred of Nazi Germany such as the gypsies, mental and physically handicapped, homo sexual, Jehovah witness and African descendants known as the Rhineland bastards – the children of German women who had babies by black soldiers. Many laws were put in place in order to support Nazi Germany’s annihilation of any other culture other than their own. One of the unconscionable acts performed was involuntary sterilization because they believed these groups of people were inferior and would ill breed among them. This is so hard to comprehend that people would be so cruel and to express such a lack of empathy toward others. The Jews and others were used in medical experiments; they were exposed to all types of diseases, stripped of their possessions, placed in concentration camps and murdered. I cannot fathom how the rest of the world, including the United states, stood nonchalantly by and allowed this madman (Hitler) to reign in power and authority when he was blatantly committing criminal acts. I am having great difficulty in comprehending how the German citizens did not openly voice their discontentment and revolt against Hitler. All of the world have to accept a modicum of responsibility since a deaf ear and acquiescence through silence spoke volumes of what Nazi Germany was doing. I believe that people that claim that the Holocaust never occurred are bliss in their ignorance. They have chosen to ignore history and the facts that are blatantly evident for reasons I cannot understand. There are people that are still alive that have stated these events took place and I think it is a conscious decision to make this standpoint. As they say ignorance of the law does not absolve you from the law, likewise denying documented history does not negate the validity of its occurrence.
The Holocaust was an atrocity of ginormous proportions that should not have ever taken place. The attempted genocide or extinction of approximately six million European Jews is documented as one of the worst dehumanizing experience of a people. This was also one of the worst acts against another culture. The reason for this was a pseudo belief of ethnic superiority by Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany during World War II. They were under the belief that they were of Aryan- blond hair, blue eyed and tall - descent and was indeed superior. The proper context of the term Aryan was used to describe different European languages but the Nazis distorted it to solidify their racial perversion. Even though the Jews are most widely acknowledged in the Holocaust, others were subjected to the wrath and hatred of Nazi Germany such as the gypsies, mental and physically handicapped, homo sexual, Jehovah witness and African descendants known as the Rhineland bastards – the children of German women who had babies by black soldiers. Many laws were put in place in order to support Nazi Germany’s annihilation of any other culture other than their own. One of the unconscionable acts performed was involuntary sterilization because they believed these groups of people were inferior and would ill breed among them. This is so hard to comprehend that people would be so cruel and to express such a lack of empathy toward others. The Jews and others were used in medical experiments; they were exposed to all types of diseases, stripped of their possessions, placed in concentration camps and murdered. I cannot fathom how the rest of the world, including the United states, stood nonchalantly by and allowed this madman (Hitler) to reign in power and authority when he was blatantly committing criminal acts. I am having great difficulty in comprehending how the German citizens did not openly voice their discontentment and revolt against Hitler. All of the world have to accept a modicum of responsibility since a deaf ear and acquiescence through silence spoke volumes of what Nazi Germany was doing. I believe that people that claim that the Holocaust never occurred are bliss in their ignorance. They have chosen to ignore history and the facts that are blatantly evident for reasons I cannot understand. There are people that are still alive that have stated these events took place and I think it is a conscious decision to make this standpoint. As they say ignorance of the law does not absolve you from the law, likewise denying documented history does not negate the validity of its occurrence.
Reflection #10
Reflection paper #10: Write a reflection on your reaction to the several articles in “Understanding Prejudices” and the section on Prejudice in Beliefs, Values and attitudes. Do you understand how prejudice happens?
The articles of discussion explored different types of prejudices. Two of them are intentional and unintentional prejudice. Intentional prejudice can be very harmful to another person, group or organization. This person is capable of more than verbal abuse and may perform harmful and/or physical acts of violence. The article described a characteristic of a person such as this to be one that does not socially connect strongly with any one in particular. I strongly disagree with that perception. I believe they do have strong ties with others that think, believe and behave as themselves. I further believe that this type of person must seek out others with similar views because they are generally driven by fear and they cannot act alone. In other words, they need and thrive on the support of others to carry out their harmful agendas. I do agree with the article’s statement that people with intentional prejudices are in awe of authoritative figures and will most likely follow their program without any reservation. This further substantiates my analysis that these types of people will not approach someone alone but will have to be supported by a group.
Unintentional prejudice is a bit more subdued than intentional prejudice. Unintentional prejudice is learned stereotypes that are imbedded in our subconscious and are evident in our behavior. We learn these different types of prejudices from a young age and they are just incorporated in our way of thinking when coming into contact with other cultures. Oftentimes, people that exhibit unintentional prejudice behavior are oblivious to the fact. This behavior can be changed; however, the person would have to be very committed in their efforts. Two critical aspects of behavior that must change is first, acknowledge that they are prejudice. This is a fact that will be difficult to face. Secondly, they must absolve themselves of all guilt, shame and blame. They must understand that they had no control about these beliefs as they were internalized when they could not critically think for themselves, thereby unable to discard absurd and negative information. I believe that prejudices – chauvinism and oppression are in fact are the same in degree of adversity and harmful effect on other groups of people and are deeply rooted in ignorance and fear of other cultures.
The articles of discussion explored different types of prejudices. Two of them are intentional and unintentional prejudice. Intentional prejudice can be very harmful to another person, group or organization. This person is capable of more than verbal abuse and may perform harmful and/or physical acts of violence. The article described a characteristic of a person such as this to be one that does not socially connect strongly with any one in particular. I strongly disagree with that perception. I believe they do have strong ties with others that think, believe and behave as themselves. I further believe that this type of person must seek out others with similar views because they are generally driven by fear and they cannot act alone. In other words, they need and thrive on the support of others to carry out their harmful agendas. I do agree with the article’s statement that people with intentional prejudices are in awe of authoritative figures and will most likely follow their program without any reservation. This further substantiates my analysis that these types of people will not approach someone alone but will have to be supported by a group.
Unintentional prejudice is a bit more subdued than intentional prejudice. Unintentional prejudice is learned stereotypes that are imbedded in our subconscious and are evident in our behavior. We learn these different types of prejudices from a young age and they are just incorporated in our way of thinking when coming into contact with other cultures. Oftentimes, people that exhibit unintentional prejudice behavior are oblivious to the fact. This behavior can be changed; however, the person would have to be very committed in their efforts. Two critical aspects of behavior that must change is first, acknowledge that they are prejudice. This is a fact that will be difficult to face. Secondly, they must absolve themselves of all guilt, shame and blame. They must understand that they had no control about these beliefs as they were internalized when they could not critically think for themselves, thereby unable to discard absurd and negative information. I believe that prejudices – chauvinism and oppression are in fact are the same in degree of adversity and harmful effect on other groups of people and are deeply rooted in ignorance and fear of other cultures.
Response to poem "We Cannot Choose But Hear"
This poem speaks loudly of the pain, the injustice of what is happening to the land, the earth we live in. The damage that greed and power hungry individual have sacrificed our world for their temporary pleasures. We are changing the evolution of our world and not in a good way. This oil debacle has made me realize that man does not have all the answers but we sure know how to create a disaster. We can be to arrogant and with that arrogance comes the selfishness . The suffering of the animals – birds, sea creatures – is of ginormous proportions. The families and lives affected is massive. Who knows the real calamity of this situation? No one does – the effects will be for decades to come. The irony of this is that if we want BP to pay for this we must make sure they don’t go out of business. I am also upset at how the people is projecting blame on the President. Really, what more can he do? I understand that they are upset, we all are and they need to stay focus on the problem at hand and don’t make idiotic remarks.
Response to poem "Fix The Shading On The Children Faces"
Once again racism raises its ugly head. The first amendment is under fire. Some people refuse to change. They just cannot see the errors of their ways. They have no empathy, therefore, cannot relate – they are tunneled vision and a dramatic rude awakening is necessary to transform their perspectives. Perhaps the shoe should be placed on the other foot. The majority becomes the minority. How can people that look like me, the children the colors of the rainbow feel equal, welcomed and accepted in a society such as this? This puts me in a melancholy mood.
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Comment to "Language Poem: hb2281"
Silence speaks in volumes. With their silence they are condoning all that is wrong with the Arizona law. This is no time to be passive aggressive. We must speak out, be heard and act. Cannot have a rebirth of the past subtly interjected into young impressionable minds and to re-start old engines into movement.
Comment to "Si m mouri, ou pral mouri!”
This makes me very sad. The help that is so desperately needed isn’t forthcoming in the necessary for to catapult a people or a country on a whole. The true test is in the people standing together to force change. True empathy will come from a country, a government’s sincerity and unselfishness to recognize, organize and get recovery and healing underway and commit to see it through.
Reflection 6
Reflection paper #6: Why are rites of passage important? Discuss Facing Mt. Kenya, Sitting Quietly and The Sambia. What is the relationship of rites of passage to formal education?
Rites of passage are informal transition from boy or girl to man or women expressed in many cultures. These rites of passage are very different and varies from culture to culture. Although we may look at other culture’s rites of passage to be dysfunctional and/or strange , they apparently serve what that culture consider to be a valid purpose to their existence. The rites of passage in my culture or others I come in contact with on a regular basis are not as outlandish or far fetched as the ones discussed in the articles. Those rites of passages really challenged my intelligence, common sense, decency and just my reasoning process on a whole. I understand the bar mitzvah that young boys at the age of thirteen go through in order to reach manhood in the Jewish faith. I also understand the quines – a huge party or ball - that a young girl of Hispanic nationality that is fifteen has to initiate her into womanhood. Having a senior prom and graduating from high school and/or college I also consider to be rites of passage in my culture but more on the formal side. Unspoken rites of passage that transforms a person into man or woman hood can be very subtle in just a level of maturity that distinguishes them from displaying childish thoughts and behavior in today’s society. I think in most cases for our culture it is defined as simply coming of age which is congruent with graduating from high school. These very perverse, strange and inhumane rites of passage described in the articles are clearly from a culture that, in my opinion have not evolved with time and has not grasped the understanding that their practices are indeed ignorant, abusive, perverse and detrimental to the health of its members. Enough time should have passed now from generation to generation for someone to see that their practices are holding back the progression of their existence. Even the caveman learned to control fire and reaped its benefits for the greater good and survival of its members. I think education is a great factor in these cultures that will make a great impact for change. I don’t think at this point these cultures can do it on their own without the intervention of other cultures providing them with factual evidence that their rites of passage are nonsensical and/or unjust. Rites of passage is informal learning which consist of expected acts that are learned through your parents and other members of that particular culture. A formal rites of passage is what all of society deems acceptable for an individual and needs to acquire in order to be productive, give back to the community, have a family and be a law abiding citizen such as a high school diploma and college degree. Formal rites of passages are written and are adhered to by all. As an educator I may be introduced to many different types of rites of passage from interaction with my students and I must appropriately respect their right to believe what they do and respect their culture. .
Rites of passage are informal transition from boy or girl to man or women expressed in many cultures. These rites of passage are very different and varies from culture to culture. Although we may look at other culture’s rites of passage to be dysfunctional and/or strange , they apparently serve what that culture consider to be a valid purpose to their existence. The rites of passage in my culture or others I come in contact with on a regular basis are not as outlandish or far fetched as the ones discussed in the articles. Those rites of passages really challenged my intelligence, common sense, decency and just my reasoning process on a whole. I understand the bar mitzvah that young boys at the age of thirteen go through in order to reach manhood in the Jewish faith. I also understand the quines – a huge party or ball - that a young girl of Hispanic nationality that is fifteen has to initiate her into womanhood. Having a senior prom and graduating from high school and/or college I also consider to be rites of passage in my culture but more on the formal side. Unspoken rites of passage that transforms a person into man or woman hood can be very subtle in just a level of maturity that distinguishes them from displaying childish thoughts and behavior in today’s society. I think in most cases for our culture it is defined as simply coming of age which is congruent with graduating from high school. These very perverse, strange and inhumane rites of passage described in the articles are clearly from a culture that, in my opinion have not evolved with time and has not grasped the understanding that their practices are indeed ignorant, abusive, perverse and detrimental to the health of its members. Enough time should have passed now from generation to generation for someone to see that their practices are holding back the progression of their existence. Even the caveman learned to control fire and reaped its benefits for the greater good and survival of its members. I think education is a great factor in these cultures that will make a great impact for change. I don’t think at this point these cultures can do it on their own without the intervention of other cultures providing them with factual evidence that their rites of passage are nonsensical and/or unjust. Rites of passage is informal learning which consist of expected acts that are learned through your parents and other members of that particular culture. A formal rites of passage is what all of society deems acceptable for an individual and needs to acquire in order to be productive, give back to the community, have a family and be a law abiding citizen such as a high school diploma and college degree. Formal rites of passages are written and are adhered to by all. As an educator I may be introduced to many different types of rites of passage from interaction with my students and I must appropriately respect their right to believe what they do and respect their culture. .
Reflection 5
Reflection paper #5: How would you have liked to be one of the “Little Rock Nine?” How do you think you would have reacted to the fact that you needed armed guards to enter school? How would you have reacted to the shouts and slurs of those on the streets who didn’t want to see you in that building?
In September 23, 1957, an attempt was made to integrate a high school in Little Rock, Arkansas called Central High School. The president of this time was Eisenhower and he was faced with enforcing the Brown verses the Board of Education law passed in 1954. Prior to this law, schools were still operating under the decision of Plessey verses Ferguson of 1896 which stated that the schools should remain segregated but will be equal – separate but equal. Brown verses The Board of Education changed all of that in 1954 but here we are, three years later in 1957 and schools are still not integrated. As a matter of fact, great imposition was posed at integrating Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas. So much in fact that President Eisenhower had to employ and federalize 1,000 Arizona National Guards to escort the African-American students into the school when the first attempt was so ill received by a mob of people chanting racial slurs and expressing great anger towards these nine students. These students became known as the Little Rock Nine and I could only imagine if it was me, how afraid and humiliated I would feel. I also would have a modicum of anger toward the people, government and my parents. Of course, this anger would only be expressed in my alone time. The trepidation that I would have endured was massive for a young child who only wanted to go to school, learn, be with friends and do normal teenage things was just a burden that no one at any age should have to face. These nine students were undoubtedly very courageous and had a strong degree of self restraint in order to hold themselves together. The Little Rock Nine clearly showed the world, especially their opposers, a level of maturity that enabled them to understand the broader picture of their commitment to attend Central High School. I am sure if I had to go through this experience, I would be courageous as well to the world. I would do as Paul Lawrence Dunbar says in his poem and “Wear the mask that grins and lies, that hide our cheeks and shades our eyes”. I would definitely give the impression that I was determined and dedicated and will go the distance. I know that I would have remained focused and concentrate on the task at hand. When I am alone would be time enough for me to allow myself to be enveloped by some tears and signs of hurt and wounded pride along with weariness. I could only imagine the significant effect this experience may have had on each of the Little Rock Nine’s lives thereafter. I am sure it is something I would never forget nor would I want to. The experience would be a driving force in my life to do better and prove to the world I will not internalize negativity but will counteract it with optimism and help create a better existence through my experience for someone else.
In September 23, 1957, an attempt was made to integrate a high school in Little Rock, Arkansas called Central High School. The president of this time was Eisenhower and he was faced with enforcing the Brown verses the Board of Education law passed in 1954. Prior to this law, schools were still operating under the decision of Plessey verses Ferguson of 1896 which stated that the schools should remain segregated but will be equal – separate but equal. Brown verses The Board of Education changed all of that in 1954 but here we are, three years later in 1957 and schools are still not integrated. As a matter of fact, great imposition was posed at integrating Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas. So much in fact that President Eisenhower had to employ and federalize 1,000 Arizona National Guards to escort the African-American students into the school when the first attempt was so ill received by a mob of people chanting racial slurs and expressing great anger towards these nine students. These students became known as the Little Rock Nine and I could only imagine if it was me, how afraid and humiliated I would feel. I also would have a modicum of anger toward the people, government and my parents. Of course, this anger would only be expressed in my alone time. The trepidation that I would have endured was massive for a young child who only wanted to go to school, learn, be with friends and do normal teenage things was just a burden that no one at any age should have to face. These nine students were undoubtedly very courageous and had a strong degree of self restraint in order to hold themselves together. The Little Rock Nine clearly showed the world, especially their opposers, a level of maturity that enabled them to understand the broader picture of their commitment to attend Central High School. I am sure if I had to go through this experience, I would be courageous as well to the world. I would do as Paul Lawrence Dunbar says in his poem and “Wear the mask that grins and lies, that hide our cheeks and shades our eyes”. I would definitely give the impression that I was determined and dedicated and will go the distance. I know that I would have remained focused and concentrate on the task at hand. When I am alone would be time enough for me to allow myself to be enveloped by some tears and signs of hurt and wounded pride along with weariness. I could only imagine the significant effect this experience may have had on each of the Little Rock Nine’s lives thereafter. I am sure it is something I would never forget nor would I want to. The experience would be a driving force in my life to do better and prove to the world I will not internalize negativity but will counteract it with optimism and help create a better existence through my experience for someone else.
Reflection 4
Reflection paper #4: Read “Culture: What It Is” and “Transformation: Creating Context, Part 2.” What new insights have you gained about culture and intercultural competence.
The word culture has been defined many times over. Many anthropologists and social scientists have many different perspectives on what the true definition of culture is. I thought that this discussion of culture was very interesting and it stretched my views of what culture really is. I decided that many (but not all) of these views are sound and logical and represented different context of the word culture. Edward Burnett Tylor’s view I believe is the most common and also is more the consensus of what most people would state as an official definition of culture. Edward Burnett Tylor is considered to be the father of cultural anthropology and he defined culture in a nutshell as being everything that you have learned as a member of the society you reside in – beliefs, values, customs, knowledge, habits acquired, laws, art. This very broad spectrum of culture, in my opinion, lent many other anthropologists and social scientists a segway into a more compartmentalized and diverse view of what culture means. Culture can be defined as something that is enjoyed by the elite and wealthy people of our society. Although they are considered a minority group, they very much set the standard in fashion and art and many aspire to partake of their world. Matthew Arnold was an English poet and he is allotted recognition for defining this premise as high culture – enjoying fine cuisine haute Couture (high fashion), music and the arts. There were so many different but I believe that they all can agree that culture is communication.
Intercultural competence is successfully being able to communicate well with others from cultures other than your own. The article was very insightful in gaining an understanding of different cultures. I realized that something as simple as a handshake may be considered disrespectful in a different culture. Standing to close to someone may be internalized as offensive in another’s culture. Another very rude and unwelcomed behavior in some cultures is directly staring someone in the eyes. This is considered to be very rude by the Native Americans. There is so much to be aware of and considered when living in a multi cultured society and an educator must take painstaking measures to acknowledge these differences and still be able to conduct and formulate one’s own culture in a classroom where all is treated as equals.
The word culture has been defined many times over. Many anthropologists and social scientists have many different perspectives on what the true definition of culture is. I thought that this discussion of culture was very interesting and it stretched my views of what culture really is. I decided that many (but not all) of these views are sound and logical and represented different context of the word culture. Edward Burnett Tylor’s view I believe is the most common and also is more the consensus of what most people would state as an official definition of culture. Edward Burnett Tylor is considered to be the father of cultural anthropology and he defined culture in a nutshell as being everything that you have learned as a member of the society you reside in – beliefs, values, customs, knowledge, habits acquired, laws, art. This very broad spectrum of culture, in my opinion, lent many other anthropologists and social scientists a segway into a more compartmentalized and diverse view of what culture means. Culture can be defined as something that is enjoyed by the elite and wealthy people of our society. Although they are considered a minority group, they very much set the standard in fashion and art and many aspire to partake of their world. Matthew Arnold was an English poet and he is allotted recognition for defining this premise as high culture – enjoying fine cuisine haute Couture (high fashion), music and the arts. There were so many different but I believe that they all can agree that culture is communication.
Intercultural competence is successfully being able to communicate well with others from cultures other than your own. The article was very insightful in gaining an understanding of different cultures. I realized that something as simple as a handshake may be considered disrespectful in a different culture. Standing to close to someone may be internalized as offensive in another’s culture. Another very rude and unwelcomed behavior in some cultures is directly staring someone in the eyes. This is considered to be very rude by the Native Americans. There is so much to be aware of and considered when living in a multi cultured society and an educator must take painstaking measures to acknowledge these differences and still be able to conduct and formulate one’s own culture in a classroom where all is treated as equals.
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Reflection Paper #9
Reflection paper #9: Why is Freud’s work on the Theory of Personality considered so important even by those who don’t agree with him? What do you think about Freud?
Sigmund Freud is considered to be the father of psychology by his supporters and his adversaries. Many may choose to disagree with his theories but none would deny that it raised interest, controversy, discussions, research and more theories. Many of Freud’s theories are perceived to be appalling in today’s society but especially so for his generation. Freud’s theories, in my opinion, is very important because it provided the foundation and opened doors for other theorists such as Adler and Jung. Adler was one of Freud’s biggest supporters. He joined Freud’s Analytical society group in 1902 and even became the first president. Unfortunately, as in many relationships there were disagreements and difference of opinions in theories. Adler cited Freud as being arrogant and obstinate person that is not willing to consider any other viewpoints in theories that are challenging to his own. Based on this premise, Adler, with many others, disassociated themselves from Freud. In fact, Adler went on to form his own group called Individual Psychology in 1911.I dare say that Adler’s success with his psychoanalysis theories is a direct result of his association with Sigmund Freud.
Personality is documented as having the most theories and research in the history of psychology. Sigmund Freud’s theory of personality described three parts that made up the human psyche – id, ego and superego. The first part of his theory, the id is described as being one’s unconscious thoughts and behavior – no connection with reality. The second part of this theory is called the ego which is the one that faces reality in order to function in society. The third part is the superego that is our conscience and measures our good and bad thoughts and behaviors. The id and the ego do not have any morals, therefore depending on the superego for direction. The id is very primal like an instinct and constantly conflict with the ego that tries desperately to stay in balance. When the id and the ego collide, it produces a repertoire of defense mechanisms that are brought to the forefront in order to combat a loss of reality.
Freud strongly upheld that childhood experiences greatly impacted adult personality. I also believe this to be true. I also agree with his views of the id, ego and superego. Although Freud was quite eccentric, he opened minds to ponder many critical and shocking behavior, feelings and emotions that can gravely affect a person’s reality. Sigmund Freud was a trailblazer and he revolutionized the field of psychology which many of his theories still are valued and respected today.
Sigmund Freud is considered to be the father of psychology by his supporters and his adversaries. Many may choose to disagree with his theories but none would deny that it raised interest, controversy, discussions, research and more theories. Many of Freud’s theories are perceived to be appalling in today’s society but especially so for his generation. Freud’s theories, in my opinion, is very important because it provided the foundation and opened doors for other theorists such as Adler and Jung. Adler was one of Freud’s biggest supporters. He joined Freud’s Analytical society group in 1902 and even became the first president. Unfortunately, as in many relationships there were disagreements and difference of opinions in theories. Adler cited Freud as being arrogant and obstinate person that is not willing to consider any other viewpoints in theories that are challenging to his own. Based on this premise, Adler, with many others, disassociated themselves from Freud. In fact, Adler went on to form his own group called Individual Psychology in 1911.I dare say that Adler’s success with his psychoanalysis theories is a direct result of his association with Sigmund Freud.
Personality is documented as having the most theories and research in the history of psychology. Sigmund Freud’s theory of personality described three parts that made up the human psyche – id, ego and superego. The first part of his theory, the id is described as being one’s unconscious thoughts and behavior – no connection with reality. The second part of this theory is called the ego which is the one that faces reality in order to function in society. The third part is the superego that is our conscience and measures our good and bad thoughts and behaviors. The id and the ego do not have any morals, therefore depending on the superego for direction. The id is very primal like an instinct and constantly conflict with the ego that tries desperately to stay in balance. When the id and the ego collide, it produces a repertoire of defense mechanisms that are brought to the forefront in order to combat a loss of reality.
Freud strongly upheld that childhood experiences greatly impacted adult personality. I also believe this to be true. I also agree with his views of the id, ego and superego. Although Freud was quite eccentric, he opened minds to ponder many critical and shocking behavior, feelings and emotions that can gravely affect a person’s reality. Sigmund Freud was a trailblazer and he revolutionized the field of psychology which many of his theories still are valued and respected today.
Reflection Paper #8
Reflection paper #8: What strikes you as most important to you as a teacher in reading about Beliefs, Values and Attitudes. What is the most important thing that you have learned?
Beliefs, values and attitudes are all a part of cultural thought and behavior that motivate each individual member of the group to perform. Any diversion or conflict in a belief, value or attitude will reflect a change in the individual of the group that is affected. Conflict in beliefs will in most cases result in transformation. I consider this premise to bthe most engaging aspect of this article and it is certainly the most important concept learned. I believe that a teacher should be challenging to a students cognitive make-up, thereby, giving them enough information to formulate their own ideas. An educator should raise thought provoking concepts that will intern motivate each student to embrace and appreciate the privilege of an education. A teacher in my opinion main purpose besides the actual formal curriculum is to inspire, empower, encourage and engage the student in such a way that his belief, values and attitudes toward the world is profoundly impacted. This will in turn, enable the student to think freely and originate his own thoughts and ideas. This premise will eventually aide the student in making necessary adjustments because of his education experience.
Students need to be motivated and encourage to find solutions and not to just be given the answer. I believe giving them the range to actively seek out answers by facilitating will broaden the horizons of their minds, character and personality. Creating a conflict in their belief system will procure better communication skills and expression of self because they will be better equipped to defend their perspectives. I also think that testing a student’s beliefs will ultimately produce a well rounded, self actualized individual that will be an asset and not a hindrance to his country, family and community. The ability to assist each student to not be afraid of new concepts and foreign ideologies and not to readily discard them but to take time and consider, ponder and weigh against what they have been taught is very exciting to me. I think it would be a great service to our world if I could facilitate them into eliminating many of the prejudices that exist today. Ridding them of disparaging ethnophaulisms (derogatory terminology based on stereotypes to belittle cultures, groups, etc.) and altolocations (verbally degrading others, groups, communities, cultures will be a great accomplishment for me and a fantastic service for the world we all live in.)
Beliefs, values and attitudes are all a part of cultural thought and behavior that motivate each individual member of the group to perform. Any diversion or conflict in a belief, value or attitude will reflect a change in the individual of the group that is affected. Conflict in beliefs will in most cases result in transformation. I consider this premise to bthe most engaging aspect of this article and it is certainly the most important concept learned. I believe that a teacher should be challenging to a students cognitive make-up, thereby, giving them enough information to formulate their own ideas. An educator should raise thought provoking concepts that will intern motivate each student to embrace and appreciate the privilege of an education. A teacher in my opinion main purpose besides the actual formal curriculum is to inspire, empower, encourage and engage the student in such a way that his belief, values and attitudes toward the world is profoundly impacted. This will in turn, enable the student to think freely and originate his own thoughts and ideas. This premise will eventually aide the student in making necessary adjustments because of his education experience.
Students need to be motivated and encourage to find solutions and not to just be given the answer. I believe giving them the range to actively seek out answers by facilitating will broaden the horizons of their minds, character and personality. Creating a conflict in their belief system will procure better communication skills and expression of self because they will be better equipped to defend their perspectives. I also think that testing a student’s beliefs will ultimately produce a well rounded, self actualized individual that will be an asset and not a hindrance to his country, family and community. The ability to assist each student to not be afraid of new concepts and foreign ideologies and not to readily discard them but to take time and consider, ponder and weigh against what they have been taught is very exciting to me. I think it would be a great service to our world if I could facilitate them into eliminating many of the prejudices that exist today. Ridding them of disparaging ethnophaulisms (derogatory terminology based on stereotypes to belittle cultures, groups, etc.) and altolocations (verbally degrading others, groups, communities, cultures will be a great accomplishment for me and a fantastic service for the world we all live in.)
I find it ironic that Emmett was called a natural born leader and through his untimely and unfortunate demise he lead the world into change by being the beginning of the civil rights movement. I feel we have made some strides in the right direction, however, not enough because these types of crimes are still occuring and our government and some people choose to support laws that are regressive and reminders of why the civil rights movement began.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
